AWS 096: Launch templates
The real problem
A team recognizes the name Launch templates but has not connected the feature to a real requirement, identity boundary, network or data path, failure mode, price dimension, and cleanup owner. A plausible configuration could still fail the workload.
Final outcome
The learner will produce a requirement-led artifact for Launch templates, inspect the matching AWS control plane in the Management Console, run a matching CloudShell or AWS CLI query, interpret the output, diagnose one failure, defend one architecture choice, and prove cleanup or approved retained state.
The practical outcome is not a command transcript. It must show what was expected, what happened, what the result proves, what it does not prove, and which evidence would change the decision.
Learning objectives
By the end of this lesson, the learner can:
- explain a launch template stores ec2 launch parameters;
- explain versions are immutable;
- explain default and latest are different pointers;
- explain launch configurations are legacy;
- explain auto scaling rollout is separate;
- connect control-plane state to the real data, network, identity, or application behavior;
- identify cost and cleanup ownership before any optional mutation;
- troubleshoot from evidence without opening broad access or adding broad permissions.
Relationship model
Requirement
|
v
Identity and policy -> AWS configuration -> network or data path -> workload behavior
| | | |
+--------------------+----------------------+--------------------+
|
v
monitoring, cost, recovery, cleanup
Use this model to separate an AWS object that exists from a result that actually works. Every arrow is a verification boundary.
Prerequisites, permissions, Region, and safety
- Learning baseline: This sequence assumes practical Linux knowledge but no prior cloud-computing or AWS knowledge. Cloud, networking, security, data, automation, and architecture concepts must come from completed earlier lessons. If a prerequisite checkpoint is incomplete, return to its linked lesson before continuing.
- Confirm a non-root caller with
aws sts get-caller-identityand keep the account number private. - Use
ap-south-1unless this lesson explicitly names a second Region. - Confirm the intended profile and Region with
aws configure listbefore interpreting an empty result. - Use read-only List, Get, and Describe permissions for the named services. Design exercises run locally and require no resource-creation permission.
- This is a no-create lesson. Console and CLI work is read-only, and every design artifact is created locally.
- Never publish account IDs, public addresses, ARNs containing private account data, session IDs, presigned URLs, object data, credentials, or KMS material.
- Do not use root, world-open SSH or RDP, disabled TLS verification, unowned resources, or irreversible retention controls in a training exercise.
Core model
| Concept | What the learner must understand |
|---|---|
| A launch template stores EC2 launch parameters | It can include AMI, instance type, key, network settings, security groups, storage, tags, IAM profile, user data, metadata options, market options, and advanced parameters. |
| Versions are immutable | Updating a launch template creates a new numbered version. Existing versions remain available until deleted, allowing review and rollback. |
| Default and latest are different pointers | The latest version is the highest number. The default version is explicitly selected and may be older. Consumers can use an exact number, the default, or supported dynamic version behavior. |
| Launch configurations are legacy | Auto Scaling launch configurations are older and immutable with fewer current EC2 features. Use launch templates for new Auto Scaling designs and migration. |
| Auto Scaling rollout is separate | Creating a new template version does not update running instances. Change the Auto Scaling reference and use instance refresh or another deployment process. |
| Permissions include PassRole and launch resources | A caller needs access to the AMI, KMS keys, subnet, security groups, instance profile, and relevant EC2 actions. Template visibility alone is not launch authority. |
How it works
Pin production to a tested version when repeatability is more important than automatic adoption. Promote a version through environments, set it as the selected Auto Scaling version, run a controlled instance refresh with health protection, and retain a known-good rollback version.
Read the result in layers:
- Scope: account, Region, VPC, bucket, AZ, endpoint, principal, object version, or resource ARN.
- Control plane: the requested configuration exists and reached an expected state.
- Behavior: the request, connection, health check, replication, restore, or application result meets the requirement.
- Operations: monitoring, failure owner, cost, retention, rollback, and cleanup are known.
Control-plane success is necessary but not sufficient. A resource can be available while policy, routing, DNS, health, data, or application behavior remains wrong.
Architecture decision table
| Requirement | Preferred direction | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Production needs exact repeatability | Pin a numbered launch-template version | Later template creation cannot silently alter the selected configuration. |
| Team wants a promoted stable pointer | Manage the default version under change control | Consumers using default follow an intentional promotion rather than every latest draft. |
| Running fleet must adopt a new AMI | Update ASG version and start instance refresh | A template version alone does not replace existing instances. |
| Old Auto Scaling group uses launch configuration | Migrate to a launch template | Templates support current EC2 capabilities and versioning. |
Professional questions normally contain several valid services. State the requirement that selects one option, why the nearest alternative fails it, and what changed requirement would reverse the choice.
AWS Management Console guided practice
Before opening a service page, write the expected account, Region, starting state, and evidence. Do not choose Create, Save, Purchase, Lock, or Delete unless the lesson explicitly authorizes the live track.
- Open EC2 Launch Templates and select a template.
- Compare Default version, Latest version, and the full parameters of two numbered versions.
- Open the related Auto Scaling group to confirm its selected version, then inspect Instance refresh before rolling out a new version.
For each step, capture the field name and value in text. A screenshot may support the record but does not replace the explanation. Console labels can evolve, so use the service search and current documentation if a navigation label differs.
CloudShell and AWS CLI practice
CloudShell is the default browser-based command environment taught in AWS 028. AWS 029 and AWS 030 cover local CLI installation and authentication. This lesson therefore does not assume that an unconfigured local shell is ready.
Start every session with:
export AWS_DEFAULT_REGION="ap-south-1"
aws sts get-caller-identity --query Arn --output text
aws configure list
Redact the account portion of the ARN before sharing. Then perform the topic query:
Compare default, latest, and the exact version selected by Auto Scaling.
aws ec2 describe-launch-templates --launch-template-names ExampleTemplate --query 'LaunchTemplates[0].{Id:LaunchTemplateId,Default:DefaultVersionNumber,Latest:LatestVersionNumber}'
aws autoscaling describe-auto-scaling-groups --auto-scaling-group-names ExampleASG --query 'AutoScalingGroups[0].LaunchTemplate'
Expected interpretation:
Do not assume latest is deployed. Resolve the ASG reference and inspect that version’s complete launch data.
Replace every replace-with-... sample value before running its command, and use only an explicitly owned resource. Explain each option first. These queries are read-only; a successful response does not authorize a later create or delete operation.
Practical work
Create p05-launch-template-v1.md for AWS 106: nw-p05-web-lt, latest Amazon Linux 2023 x86_64 AMI resolved in ap-south-1, selected small x86 type, no key pair, nw-p05-app-sg, no subnet in the template, no public IP, 8 GiB encrypted gp3 root with delete-on-termination, deterministic local Python web-service user data on TCP 8080, IMDSv2 required, hop limit 1, Project tags, and disabled detailed monitoring. Define version 2 failure and rollback tests. Do not create the template.
The evidence package must contain:
- the problem and final requirement in the learner's own words;
- caller type and Region with private identifiers redacted;
- exact planned values, ownership, and cost class;
- one Console observation and matching CLI or API evidence;
- one behavior result or supplied data-plane record;
- one denied, failed, or counterexample result and evidence-led diagnosis;
- one architecture choice plus the rejected alternative;
- cleanup proof or explicit retained-state owner, expiry, and next lesson.
Verification standard
Use expected state before observed state. Record timestamps in UTC and preserve the original failure before changing anything. A passing submission answers all four questions:
- What exact requirement was tested?
- Which evidence proves the AWS configuration?
- Which evidence proves the workload behavior?
- What remains unproven or requires later monitoring?
If AWS returns no rows, verify account, Region, permission, filters, pagination, resource type, and deletion state before concluding that nothing exists.
Common failures and troubleshooting
| Symptom | Evidence first | Likely boundary | Smallest safe response |
|---|---|---|---|
| object appears missing | caller, Region, filters, pagination, tags | scope or read permission | align scope before creating a duplicate |
| state remains pending or unavailable | service state, events, dependencies, quotas | dependency or capacity | correct the named dependency and wait with a bound |
| AccessDenied | principal, action, resource, explicit-deny context | identity, resource, endpoint, organization, or KMS policy | change only the proven policy layer |
| configuration exists but behavior fails | route, DNS, security, listener, health, logs, object version | data path or application | test the next boundary and change one control |
| bill is higher than expected | hours, bytes, requests, AZs, addresses, retention | cost model or retained resource | stop optional work and reconcile the ledger |
| cleanup is blocked | dependency inventory and owning service | deletion order or immutable state | remove owned dependants in reviewed reverse order |
Do not troubleshoot by attaching administrator access, opening administration ports to the internet, disabling encryption, retrying uncontrolled creation, deleting unknown resources, or weakening retention.
Cost, cleanup, and retained state
No AWS resource is created. Close CloudShell and remove or redact downloaded evidence.
Cleanup evidence requires terminal state and an after-inventory. Search related ENIs, public IPv4 addresses, EBS volumes and snapshots, load balancers, target groups, Auto Scaling instances, endpoints, logs, S3 versions and delete markers, backup recovery points, and global IAM roles when they apply. Billing data can lag, so schedule a later review.
Architecture and certification decisions
- Certification coverage: SAA-C03; SOA-C03; SAP-C02; DOP-C02.
- Exam mapping: SAA D2-D4.
- Explain service scope, failure boundary, consistency, recovery, security, operations, and price rather than matching a keyword.
- Treat availability and durability, encryption and authorization, routing and filtering, health and lifecycle, backup and replication, and discount and capacity as separate concepts.
- Do not reproduce protected certification questions.
Knowledge check
- Can an existing launch-template version be edited?
Expected direction: No. Create a new version.
- Does latest always equal default?
Expected direction: No. They are independent pointers until default is explicitly changed.
- Does creating version 8 update running EC2 instances?
Expected direction: No. A rollout or replacement process is required.
- Why pin a version during an incident rollback?
Expected direction: It restores a known configuration without following a newer moving pointer.
Completion gate and assessment
| Area | Points | Passing evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Requirement and model | 15 | Correct scope, terminology, and final outcome |
| Console evidence | 15 | Current path and interpreted fields |
| CLI or API evidence | 15 | Scoped command, expected result, and limitations |
| Behavior or decision exercise | 20 | Reproducible result or defensible architecture reasoning |
| Troubleshooting | 15 | Original symptom, hypothesis, one change, retest, rollback |
| Security and cost | 10 | Least privilege, data protection, current price dimensions |
| Cleanup and handoff | 10 | Terminal-state proof or approved retained-state record |
Pass at 80 out of 100 with no critical safety failure. A missing practical artifact, unexplained output, unsafe access, destructive action outside the owned scope, unplanned billed resource, or false cleanup claim requires remediation and a changed retest.